Controversial Yanga-Simba Match Postponed Amid Debate
The postponement of the Yanga-Simba derby sparks debate over regulatory adherence, with legal experts calling for further action.

Regulatory Dispute Follows Controversial Postponement of Yanga-Simba Derby
Dar es Salaam, March 9, 2025
The decision to postpone the highly anticipated Mainland Tanzania Premier League (TPL) clash between Young Africans (Yanga) and Simba SC, originally set for March 8, 2025, has ignited a fierce debate among football stakeholders and fans alike.
The postponement, announced by the Tanzania Premier League Board (TPLB), followed a declaration by Simba SC that they would not participate in the match due to an incident on March 7. The incident allegedly saw Yanga fans blocking Simba's players from completing their final training session at Benjamin Mkapa Stadium. The match, which was eagerly awaited by supporters of both teams, was to be a key fixture in the Tanzanian football calendar.
However, the TPLB’s decision to delay the match has been met with strong criticism. Many are questioning whether the league body adhered to the proper regulations in making this ruling.
Regulatory Concerns Raised Over Postponement
Tanzania’s football rules are clear on the conditions under which a match may be postponed. Rule 34 of the league’s regulations states that a postponement is allowed only under specific circumstances: if the national team has a scheduled fixture, if a force majeure event occurs beyond human control, or if three or more players from a club are called up to the national team.
Furthermore, any request for a postponement must be submitted in writing at least 14 days before the scheduled date unless an emergency arises. Critics of the postponement argue that these criteria were not met in this instance, suggesting that the TPLB may have acted outside of its regulatory framework.
Legal and Football Expert Reactions
The TPLB’s ruling has sparked a wave of legal and professional criticism. Renowned Tanzanian lawyer Alex Mgongolwa voiced his concerns, stating that Simba SC should have been compelled to play the match as scheduled and then lodge any complaints afterward, rather than immediately requesting a postponement.
“This decision is not in line with CAF or FIFA regulations,” Mgongolwa explained. “Yanga’s rights have been infringed, and they should consider taking the matter to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).”
Other football analysts have also weighed in, cautioning that the TPLB’s action could set a dangerous precedent for future decisions and undermine the integrity of Tanzania’s football governance.
Yanga's Opposition and TPLB's Justification
As the home team, Yanga SC has vehemently opposed the postponement. The club’s officials have maintained that the match should have gone ahead as originally scheduled, emphasizing that they would not agree to play on a different date if the match were rescheduled.
In response, the TPLB has defended its decision, asserting that the postponement would provide the necessary time to investigate Simba’s allegations. The board assured all involved parties that a comprehensive report would be published, followed by an announcement of a new match date.
This controversy highlights the growing tensions between Tanzania’s football authorities, clubs, and legal experts over the handling of match postponements and the need for clear adherence to established regulations.
What's Your Reaction?






