Trae Young Stats: What the Numbers Reveal About His Evolving NBA Role
Trae Young’s stats have always told a bigger story than simple scoring averages. Since entering the NBA, he has been one of the league’s most recognizable offensive guards: a deep-range shooter, high-volume creator, and elite passer capable of bending defenses with both his shot-making and playmaking. But the latest numbers surrounding Young show a player at an important career crossroads.
- A New Chapter in Washington
- The Contract Question Behind the Stats
- From Atlanta Star to Washington Building Block
- Trae Young Career Stats by Season
- The Assist Numbers Remain His Signature
- The Efficiency Debate
- Turnovers Are Part of the Package
- Plus/Minus Shows the Team Context
- Recent Game Log: Late-Season Absences Stand Out
- What the Stats Say About Young’s Current Value
- Why Washington’s Decision Matters
- The Bigger Picture: Trae Young’s Stats Are Still Elite, But the Conversation Has Changed
- Conclusion: A Star Guard Entering a Defining Phase
The most recent statistical snapshot places Young in a new competitive context, with the Washington Wizards now tied to his future after acquiring him from the Atlanta Hawks. His numbers with Washington are limited to a small sample, but they are still meaningful: 15.2 points, 6.2 assists and 3.0 rebounds per game while shooting 59.5% from the field and 42.9% from three-point range in five games with the Wizards.
Those figures do not erase the larger picture of Young’s career. Instead, they add another layer to it. For years, Young has been defined by high usage, heavy offensive responsibility and elite assist totals. Now, as Washington weighs a potential contract extension and builds around a core featuring Young, Anthony Davis and Alex Sarr, his statistical profile is being examined through a different lens: value, efficiency, durability, defense and long-term roster construction.

A New Chapter in Washington
Young was acquired by the Washington Wizards in January in exchange for CJ McCollum and Corey Kispert. The move gave Washington a high-profile lead guard while also reshaping the conversation around the franchise’s future.
The Wizards’ broader situation is significant. The team holds the No. 1 overall pick in the 2026 NBA Draft and has a core that includes Trae Young, Anthony Davis and Alex Sarr. That combination creates both opportunity and pressure. Young’s numbers are no longer being judged only as individual production; they are now part of a larger question about whether Washington can build a competitive team around him.
In five games with the Wizards during the 2025-26 season, Young averaged:
| Category | Wizards Average |
|---|---|
| Minutes | 20.8 |
| Points | 15.2 |
| Field Goal % | 59.5% |
| Three-Point % | 42.9% |
| Free Throw % | 70.8% |
| Rebounds | 3.0 |
| Assists | 6.2 |
| Steals | 0.6 |
| Blocks | 0.2 |
| Turnovers | 2.6 |
| Personal Fouls | 2.6 |
| Plus/Minus | -5.8 |
The most striking part of that small sample is efficiency. Young’s 59.5% field goal rate and 42.9% three-point shooting with Washington are far above his usual career shooting profile. However, the sample size is only five games, so it should be treated carefully. It suggests strong shooting form in limited minutes, not a complete reinvention.
The assist figure, 6.2 per game, is also lower than several of his peak Atlanta seasons. That is partly connected to the minutes load: 20.8 minutes per game with Washington compared with 36.0 minutes per game in both the 2024-25 and 2023-24 seasons with Atlanta.
The Contract Question Behind the Stats
Young’s latest numbers matter because they arrive at the same time as contract discussions. NBA insider Marc Stein reported that early projections for a new deal with Young sit at $120 million over three years.
Young is under contract for next season with a player option at $48.967 million. He is eligible for a three-year extension worth up to nearly $160 million, but the expectation described in the available information is that he is unlikely to receive that maximum-level figure.
The reason is not his offensive talent. Young remains a proven scorer and playmaker. The concern is roster-building value. NBA teams have become increasingly hesitant to build around undersized guards who are defensive liabilities, especially at salaries above $50 million per year.
If Young signs a three-year deal in the range of $120 million, the average annual value would be around $40 million. That would reportedly make him the 10th-highest-paid point guard in the NBA.
That financial context is important because Young’s stats can be read in two ways. His offensive production supports a major contract. His defensive limitations and team-building questions complicate the price.
From Atlanta Star to Washington Building Block
Young’s career numbers show why he has remained such a major figure in NBA discussions. During his Atlanta Hawks years, he consistently produced as one of the league’s best offensive engines.
His best scoring season came in 2019-20, when he averaged 29.6 points per game with 9.3 assists. That season established him as more than a promising young guard; it made him a central offensive star.
His most balanced peak came in 2021-22, when he averaged 28.4 points and 9.7 assists while shooting 46.0% from the field, 38.2% from three and 90.4% from the free-throw line. That season remains one of the clearest examples of Young’s elite offensive ceiling.
By 2024-25, his role had shifted toward even heavier playmaking. He averaged 24.2 points and a career-best 11.6 assists per game for the Hawks. The scoring dipped from his highest years, but his passing reached a new level.
Trae Young Career Stats by Season
| Season | Team | GP | MIN | PTS | FG% | 3PT% | FT% | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wizards | 5 | 20.8 | 15.2 | 59.5 | 42.9 | 70.8 | 3.0 | 6.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 2.6 | -5.8 |
| 2025-26 | Hawks | 10 | 28.0 | 19.3 | 41.5 | 30.5 | 86.3 | 1.5 | 8.9 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 2.0 | -3.7 |
| 2024-25 | Hawks | 76 | 36.0 | 24.2 | 41.1 | 34.0 | 87.5 | 3.1 | 11.6 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 4.7 | 1.9 | +0.5 |
| 2023-24 | Hawks | 54 | 36.0 | 25.7 | 43.0 | 37.3 | 85.5 | 2.8 | 10.8 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 4.3 | 2.0 | -2.1 |
| 2022-23 | Hawks | 73 | 34.8 | 26.2 | 42.9 | 33.5 | 88.6 | 3.0 | 10.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 4.1 | 1.4 | +1.4 |
| 2021-22 | Hawks | 76 | 34.9 | 28.4 | 46.0 | 38.2 | 90.4 | 3.7 | 9.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4.0 | 1.7 | +2.1 |
| 2020-21 | Hawks | 63 | 33.7 | 25.3 | 43.8 | 34.3 | 88.6 | 3.9 | 9.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 4.1 | 1.8 | +4.2 |
| 2019-20 | Hawks | 60 | 35.3 | 29.6 | 43.7 | 36.1 | 86.0 | 4.2 | 9.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 4.8 | 1.7 | -3.8 |
| 2018-19 | Hawks | 81 | 30.9 | 19.1 | 41.8 | 32.4 | 82.9 | 3.7 | 8.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 3.8 | — | — |
The table shows a clear pattern. Young became an elite offensive player early, moved into a high-scoring prime, then developed into one of the NBA’s most productive passers.
The Assist Numbers Remain His Signature
While Young’s scoring often receives the most attention, his assist production may be the most durable part of his statistical identity.
From 2020-21 through 2024-25, he averaged at least 9.4 assists per game every season. His playmaking rose steadily:
- 9.4 assists in 2020-21
- 9.7 assists in 2021-22
- 10.2 assists in 2022-23
- 10.8 assists in 2023-24
- 11.6 assists in 2024-25
That progression matters. It suggests that as defenses adjusted to his scoring, Young became increasingly capable of punishing pressure with passing. His offensive value has never depended only on making long threes or drawing fouls. He can create advantages for teammates at a very high level.
For Washington, that is central to his fit. A roster with Anthony Davis, Alex Sarr and a future No. 1 overall pick needs a guard who can organize possessions, manipulate defenses and feed frontcourt talent. Young’s assist history supports that role.
The Efficiency Debate
Young’s efficiency has moved up and down throughout his career. In 2021-22, he shot 46.0% from the field and 38.2% from three, one of his strongest all-around shooting seasons. In 2024-25, he shot 41.1% from the field and 34.0% from three while carrying a major creation burden.
His brief Washington sample was much sharper: 59.5% from the field and 42.9% from three. That is encouraging, but it cannot be treated as a long-term baseline because it came across only five games.
The more meaningful question is whether Washington can structure an offense that gives Young cleaner looks and reduces the difficult-shot burden that often defined his Atlanta years. If Young can operate with more balance around him, his efficiency could improve. If he is again asked to dominate every possession, the numbers may settle closer to his established career range.
Turnovers Are Part of the Package
Young’s turnover numbers are another major part of the statistical conversation. High-usage point guards often commit more turnovers because they handle the ball constantly, initiate offense and attempt difficult passes.
Young averaged 4.8 turnovers in 2019-20, 4.1 in 2020-21, 4.0 in 2021-22, 4.1 in 2022-23, 4.3 in 2023-24 and 4.7 in 2024-25. With Washington, that number dropped to 2.6, but again, his minutes and sample size were much smaller.
The key is not whether Young can completely eliminate turnovers. That is unrealistic for a player with his role. The more relevant issue is whether his assists, scoring and spacing value outweigh the possession cost. Historically, his assist totals have been strong enough to justify the risk, but on a team trying to become more balanced, Washington may want a version of Young who plays slightly more efficiently and selectively.
Plus/Minus Shows the Team Context
Young’s plus/minus figures reflect the complicated team context of his career.
His best listed plus/minus came in 2020-21 at +4.2, followed by +2.1 in 2021-22 and +1.4 in 2022-23. Those numbers suggest that during those seasons, his offensive impact was translating more positively within Atlanta’s overall team structure.
The later numbers are more mixed. He posted -2.1 in 2023-24, +0.5 in 2024-25, -3.7 in his 2025-26 Hawks sample and -5.8 in his 2025-26 Wizards sample.
Plus/minus should not be used as a standalone judgment of a player. It is influenced by teammates, rotations, opponents and team quality. Still, the numbers support the broader debate around Young: his individual offense is elite, but team success depends heavily on roster construction, defensive cover and how much pressure the team places on him to create everything.
Recent Game Log: Late-Season Absences Stand Out
The provided game log lists multiple late-season matchups in which Young recorded no minutes and no statistical production. These include games on:
- 28 Mar at Warriors
- 30 Mar at Trail Blazers
- 31 Mar at Lakers
- 2 Apr vs 76ers
- 4 Apr at Heat
- 5 Apr at Nets
- 8 Apr vs Bulls
- 10 Apr vs Bulls
- 11 Apr vs Heat
- 13 Apr at Cavaliers
Each of those listed games shows 0 minutes, 0 points, 0 field-goal attempts, 0 rebounds, 0 assists and no recorded box-score impact.
That detail matters because availability is part of player evaluation. Young’s full statistical value depends not only on what he produces when he plays, but also how consistently he is available during key stretches.
What the Stats Say About Young’s Current Value
Young’s value remains built on three major strengths: scoring gravity, passing volume and offensive creation.
Even when his shooting percentages fluctuate, defenses must account for his range. That opens passing lanes. His assist production confirms that he can turn defensive attention into high-value opportunities for teammates.
However, the concerns are also clear. His defensive limitations affect roster-building. His turnovers can be high. His best role may require specific personnel around him: strong defenders, rim protection, reliable finishers and secondary creators who can reduce his burden.
That is why the reported $120 million projection is so important. It signals that Young is still viewed as a major player, but perhaps not as a blank-check franchise centerpiece at the highest salary tier.
Why Washington’s Decision Matters
The Wizards are not simply deciding whether Young is talented. That answer is obvious. They are deciding what kind of team they want to become.
If Washington gives Young a three-year deal around $120 million, it would be betting that his offensive strengths can accelerate the franchise’s rebuild or retool. With the No. 1 overall pick incoming, the Wizards could add another foundational player and create a more balanced roster around him.
But the next move after Young may involve Anthony Davis. The available information notes that Davis has not exactly expressed excitement for remaining with the Wizards long-term as he seeks a new contract. It is also unclear how much of a trade market exists for him.
That means Young’s extension could be the first major domino. Once his contract situation is settled and Washington makes the first overall pick, the franchise’s direction around Davis may become the next major storyline.
The Bigger Picture: Trae Young’s Stats Are Still Elite, But the Conversation Has Changed
Trae Young’s career stats show a player with rare offensive gifts. He has averaged near or above 25 points in multiple seasons, reached double-digit assists in three straight Atlanta campaigns from 2022-23 through 2024-25, and remained one of the NBA’s most dangerous creators.
But the conversation around him has matured. Early in his career, the question was how high his offensive ceiling could rise. Now, the question is how that offensive ceiling fits into a winning roster at a major salary number.
His Washington sample offers both optimism and caution. The efficiency was excellent. The playmaking remained useful. But the minutes were limited, the sample was small and the team context remains unsettled.
For the Wizards, Young’s stats are not just historical numbers. They are evidence in a larger decision about identity, spending and competitive direction.
Conclusion: A Star Guard Entering a Defining Phase
Trae Young’s stats reveal a player who has already proved he can score, pass and carry an NBA offense. His career has included elite scoring seasons, rising assist numbers and several years as one of the league’s most productive offensive guards.
Now, his numbers are being measured against a new standard. With the Washington Wizards considering a major extension and building around a core that includes Young, Anthony Davis, Alex Sarr and the No. 1 overall pick, his production must translate into sustainable team direction.
The next stage of Young’s career will not be judged only by points and assists. It will be judged by efficiency, availability, defense, contract value and whether Washington can build the right roster around his strengths.
For anyone searching “trae young stats,” the numbers show more than a box score. They show a star guard entering one of the most important phases of his NBA career.
